In Re Jacobsen

California Supreme Court

In Re Jacobsen

289 P. 159, 209 Cal. 539, 1930 Cal. LEXIS 510

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJune 6, 1930

DocketDocket No. L.A. 11951.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 289 P. 159 (In Re Jacobsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Jacobsen, 289 P. 159, 209 Cal. 539, 1930 Cal. LEXIS 510 (Cal. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This petitioner was admitted to practice

law in this state by an order made and entered by the District Court of Appeal in and for the Second District on June 14, 1926. Subsequently he was convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude and placed on probation. This court thereafter, on October 18, 1927, made and entered an order that pending the termination of probation he be suspended as an attorney and counselor at law until the further order of the court. (202 Cal. 289 [260 Pac. 294].) *540 He has now made an application that such order of suspension be revoked, and that he be reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law.

When the application came on to be heard in open court counsel for The State Bar directed the attention of the court to the fact that since the filing of the application for reinstatement the order admitting Jacobsen to practice law has been set aside and his license revoked by the court which admitted him to practice. (In re Jacobsen, 105 Cal. App. 236 [287 Pac. 131].) The petitioner being no longer an attorney, his application presents only a moot question, and it is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This petitioner was admitted to practice

law in this state by an order made and entered by the District Court of Appeal in and for the Second District on June 14, 1926. Subsequently he was convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude and placed on probation. This court thereafter, on October 18, 1927, made and entered an order that pending the termination of probation he be suspended as an attorney and counselor at law until the further order of the court. (202 Cal. 289 [260 Pac. 294].) *540 He has now made an application that such order of suspension be revoked, and that he be reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law.

When the application came on to be heard in open court counsel for The State Bar directed the attention of the court to the fact that since the filing of the application for reinstatement the order admitting Jacobsen to practice law has been set aside and his license revoked by the court which admitted him to practice. (In re Jacobsen, 105 Cal. App. 236 [287 Pac. 131].) The petitioner being no longer an attorney, his application presents only a moot question, and it is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 P. 159, 209 Cal. 539, 1930 Cal. LEXIS 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jacobsen-cal-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack