In re Jacobs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Jacobs

829 A.2d 667

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 26, 2003

DocketNo. 752 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 829 A.2d 667 (In re Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jacobs, 829 A.2d 667 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2003, Robert C. Jacobs having been suspended from the practice of law before the Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, for a period of forty-one months by its notification dated October 30, 2002; the said Robert C. Jacobs having been directed on March 27, 2003, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is

ORDERED that Robert C. Jacobs is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of forty-one months retroactive to June 13, 2002, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2003, Robert C. Jacobs having been suspended from the practice of law before the Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, for a period of forty-one months by its notification dated October 30, 2002; the said Robert C. Jacobs having been directed on March 27, 2003, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is

ORDERED that Robert C. Jacobs is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of forty-one months retroactive to June 13, 2002, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

829 A.2d 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jacobs-pa-2003.