in Re Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc., Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Jacobs Engineering, Inc., and NorWest Hydraulic & Pneumatic, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 8, 2018
Docket14-17-00935-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc., Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Jacobs Engineering, Inc., and NorWest Hydraulic & Pneumatic, Inc. (in Re Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc., Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Jacobs Engineering, Inc., and NorWest Hydraulic & Pneumatic, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc., Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Jacobs Engineering, Inc., and NorWest Hydraulic & Pneumatic, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 8, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-17-00935-CV

IN RE JACOBS FIELD SERVICES NORTH AMERICA, INC., JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC., JACOBS ENGINEERING, INC., AND NORWEST HYDRAULIC & PNEUMATIC, INC., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015-27771

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 1, 2017, relators Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc., Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Jacobs Engineering, Inc., and NorWest Hydraulic & Pneumatic, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2017); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Fredericka Phillips, presiding judge of the 61st District Court of Harris County, to set aside her December 1, 2017 orders (1) granting real parties in interest’s motion to exclude relators’ witnesses; and (2) denying relators’ motion for continuance.

Relators filed an unopposed motion to dismiss their petition because the parties have settled the case. The requested relief is now moot. Therefore, the motion is GRANTED.

Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed. Relators’ motion for temporary relief is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc., Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Jacobs Engineering, Inc., and NorWest Hydraulic & Pneumatic, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jacobs-field-services-north-america-inc-jacobs-engineering-group-texapp-2018.