In Re Jacobs

166 P. 801, 175 Cal. 661, 1917 Cal. LEXIS 737
California Supreme Court·Decided August 1, 1917·No. Crim. No. 2103.·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

No good cause for the issuance of a writ appears. The question of insufficiency of evidence to warrant conviction cannot be considered on habeas corpus. Subdivision 7 of section1487 of the Penal Code, authorizing a discharge on habeascorpus "where a party has been committed on a criminal charge without reasonable or probable cause," is applicable only where a person has been committed for trial by a magistrate without reasonable or probable cause. The complaint in the police court sufficiently stated facts constituting the offense of petit larceny (Pen. Code, secs. 484 and 488). The words "by trick and device" do not impair their effect in this regard. The judgment shows a conviction of the crime of petit larceny. If the evidence adduced on the trial was not sufficient to show the guilt of the prisoner of that charge, his remedy was by appeal.

The application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Jacobs, 166 P. 801, 175 Cal. 661, 1917 Cal. LEXIS 737 (Cal. 1917).

166 P. 801 (In Re Jacobs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stokes v. State
411 P.2d 392 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1966)
In Re Lindley
177 P.2d 918 (California Supreme Court, 1947)
In re Wedderburn ex rel. Apgar
151 P.2d 889 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)
In Re Bell
122 P.2d 22 (California Supreme Court, 1942)
In Re Coon
112 P.2d 767 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
In Re Moffett
64 P.2d 1190 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
In Re Gutierrez
36 P.2d 712 (California Court of Appeal, 1934)
In Re Cutler
1 Cal. App. 2d 273 (California Court of Appeal, 1934)
In Re Martin
22 P.2d 269 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
In Re Hall
263 P. 295 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
In Re Trauger
262 P. 780 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
In Re Lindsley
241 P. 934 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)
In Re Kaster
198 P. 1029 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)
In Re Application of Gutierrez
188 P. 1004 (California Court of Appeal, 1920)