In re Jacob W.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

In re Jacob W.

177 A.3d 563, 328 Conn. 902

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJanuary 24, 2018

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 177 A.3d 563 (In re Jacob W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jacob W., 177 A.3d 563, 328 Conn. 902 (Colo. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

James P. Sexton, assigned counsel, and Megan L. Wade, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The petition by the respondent father for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 178 Conn. App. 195, 172 A.3d 1274 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly reverse the trial court's judgment denying the custodian's petition to terminate the father's parental rights when it determined that the trial court's judgment was legally and logically inconsistent?"

ROBINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James P. Sexton, assigned counsel, and Megan L. Wade, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The petition by the respondent father for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 178 Conn. App. 195, 172 A.3d 1274 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly reverse the trial court's judgment denying the custodian's petition to terminate the father's parental rights when it determined that the trial court's judgment was legally and logically inconsistent?"

ROBINSON, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 A.3d 563, 328 Conn. 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jacob-w-conn-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack