In Re Jacob Ray Dunn v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Order issued December 19, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
the underlying matter have been resolved . . . [and] [relator] no longer wishes to pursue his petition for writ of mandamus.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
In his motion, relator requests that we dismiss the original proceeding, but the motion also asks the Court, “without regard to the merits, [to] direct[] [the trial court] to vacate and set aside the Reinstatement Order and Default Judgment” pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(B). See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.2(a)(2)(B). “An appellate court cannot dismiss an . . . original proceeding, and at the same time, grant affirmative relief in the case.” In re Fam. Dollar Stores of Tex., LLC, No. 08-16-00109-CV, 2016 WL 4098657, at *1 (Tex. App.—El Paso July 29, 2016, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Thus, we construe the motion as requesting dismissal of the original proceeding.
Accordingly, we grant relator’s motion and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Jacob Ray Dunn v. the State of Texas (In Re Jacob Ray Dunn v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.