In Re Jacob Ray Dunn v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 19, 2024
Docket01-24-00727-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Jacob Ray Dunn v. the State of Texas (In Re Jacob Ray Dunn v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Jacob Ray Dunn v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Order issued December 19, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00727-CV ——————————— IN RE JACOB RAY DUNN, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Jacob Ray Dunn, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus,

challenging the trial court’s March 9, 2023 Reinstatement Order and December 18,

2023 Default Judgment.1 Relator has now filed an Agreed Motion to Dismiss his

petition for writ of mandamus, stating that “[a]ll issues and controversies relating to

1 The underlying case is Nelson Corea v. Jacob Ray Dunn, Cause No. 2020-32535, in the 215th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Elaine H. Palmer presiding. the underlying matter have been resolved . . . [and] [relator] no longer wishes to

pursue his petition for writ of mandamus.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

In his motion, relator requests that we dismiss the original proceeding, but the

motion also asks the Court, “without regard to the merits, [to] direct[] [the trial court]

to vacate and set aside the Reinstatement Order and Default Judgment” pursuant to

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(B). See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.2(a)(2)(B).

“An appellate court cannot dismiss an . . . original proceeding, and at the same time,

grant affirmative relief in the case.” In re Fam. Dollar Stores of Tex., LLC, No.

08-16-00109-CV, 2016 WL 4098657, at *1 (Tex. App.—El Paso July 29, 2016, orig.

proceeding) (mem. op.). Thus, we construe the motion as requesting dismissal of

the original proceeding.

Accordingly, we grant relator’s motion and dismiss the petition for writ of

mandamus. We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Countiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Jacob Ray Dunn v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jacob-ray-dunn-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.