In re Jackson Steinway Co.

142 A.D. 905
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1910·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the authority of Matter of Bankers Investing Co. (141 App. Div. 591). We intend hereby to decide that the amount of the assessments without interest should be offset against the amount which was due for award on the date when the assessments became payable. If, in the proceedings to compel payment of the award with interest, referred to in. the petition herein, a greater amount has been allowed for interest than would be justly due under the principle above referred to, application maybe made to the Special Term in those proceedings for a readjustment of the amount thereof. Jenks, Burr, Thomas, Rich and-Carr, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Jackson Steinway Co., 142 A.D. 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

142 A.D. 905 (In re Jackson Steinway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Acquiring Title to an Unnamed Street
149 A.D. 618 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)