In re Jackson Steinway Co.
This text of 142 A.D. 905 (In re Jackson Steinway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the authority of Matter of Bankers Investing Co. (141 App. Div. 591). We intend hereby to decide that the amount of the assessments without interest should be offset against the amount which was due for award on the date when the assessments became payable. If, in the proceedings to compel payment of the award with interest, referred to in. the petition herein, a greater amount has been allowed for interest than would be justly due under the principle above referred to, application maybe made to the Special Term in those proceedings for a readjustment of the amount thereof. Jenks, Burr, Thomas, Rich and-Carr, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 A.D. 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jackson-steinway-co-nyappdiv-1910.