In re Jackson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Jackson

818 S.E.2d 213, 424 S.C. 255

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided August 16, 2018·No. Appellate Case No. 2015-002351·Published

Opinion

In December 2015, this Court authorized respondent to be admitted to practice law subject to certain conditions. He was subsequently admitted to practice law in South Carolina in February 2016.

By order dated August 3, 2018, this Court suspended the respondent from the practice of law for nine months based on his failure to comply with the conditions of his admission. This order is to provide the bench, bar and public with notice of this suspension.

/s/ Donald W. Beatty, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In December 2015, this Court authorized respondent to be admitted to practice law subject to certain conditions. He was subsequently admitted to practice law in South Carolina in February 2016.

By order dated August 3, 2018, this Court suspended the respondent from the practice of law for nine months based on his failure to comply with the conditions of his admission. This order is to provide the bench, bar and public with notice of this suspension.

/s/ Donald W. Beatty, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

In re Jackson, 818 S.E.2d 213, 424 S.C. 255 (S.C. 2018).

Pincite

818 S.E.2d 213 (In re Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.