In re Jackson

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

In re Jackson

39 A. 452, 17 Del. 10, 1 Penne. 10, 1897 Del. LEXIS 21

New York Court of General Session of the Peace·Decided October 2, 1897·Published

Opinion

Lore, C. J:—

We understand there is no objection as to the sufficiency or regularity of any of the papers. On the face of this paper, the petitioner is clearly entitled to this commission. The time to object, it occurs to the Court, is when the return is made by the freeholders. You take your commission subject to the right of the other parties to except at that time.

The freeholders were then appointed by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lore, C. J:—

We understand there is no objection as to the sufficiency or regularity of any of the papers. On the face of this paper, the petitioner is clearly entitled to this commission. The time to object, it occurs to the Court, is when the return is made by the freeholders. You take your commission subject to the right of the other parties to except at that time.

The freeholders were then appointed by the Court.

In re Jackson, 39 A. 452, 17 Del. 10, 1 Penne. 10, 1897 Del. LEXIS 21 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).

Pincite

39 A. 452 (In re Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.