In re Jackson
This text of 252 A.D. 701 (In re Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The parties having agreed in open court that this appeal may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Order denying the petitioner’s application affirmed, without costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of .discretion. There was no substantial compliance with the statute. (Matter of Dorsey v. Cohen, 268 N. Y. 620.) Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 701, 298 N.Y.S. 988, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jackson-nyappdiv-1937.