In re Jackson

200 A.3d 1292, 236 N.J. 553
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 6, 2019
DocketD-79 September Term 2018; 082382
StatusPublished

This text of 200 A.3d 1292 (In re Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Jackson, 200 A.3d 1292, 236 N.J. 553 (N.J. 2019).

Opinion

Samuel D. Jackson of Purchase, New York, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2017, having pleaded guilty in the Supreme Court, County of Nassau, State of New York to two counts of second-degree unlawful surveillance, in violation of 250.45 Subdivision 4 of the Penal Law of the State of New York, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(b)(1), Samuel D. Jackson is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Samuel D. Jackson be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that Samuel D. Jackson comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further **554ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 A.3d 1292, 236 N.J. 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jackson-nj-2019.