In re Jackson

Federal Circuit

In re Jackson

568 F. App'x 892

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedAugust 5, 2014

DocketNo. 2014-142

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 568 F. App'x 892 (In re Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jackson, 568 F. App'x 892 (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark C. Jackson petitions for a writ of mandamus relating to his complaint brought before the United States Court of Federal Claims.

On July 23, 2014, Jackson filed a notice of appeal, docketed as 2014-5121, from the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction. A party who seeks a writ bears the burden of proving that he has no other means of obtaining the relief desired. Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 309, 109 S.Ct. 1814, 104 L.Ed.2d 318 (1989). Because Jackson may raise arguments concerning his case in his appeal, mandamus relief is not appropriate.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

(2) All pending motions are denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI