In re Jaccob S.

77 A.D.3d 523, 909 N.Y.S.2d 60
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 21, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 77 A.D.3d 523 (In re Jaccob S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Jaccob S., 77 A.D.3d 523, 909 N.Y.S.2d 60 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

[524]*524Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Clark V. Richardson, J., at fact-finding hearing; Monica Drinane, J., at disposition), entered on or about August 18, 2009, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of menacing in the third degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the petition dismissed.

The court’s finding was based on legally insufficient evidence. A person commits the crime of third-degree menacing when, “by physical menace, he or she intentionally places or attempts to place another person in fear of death, imminent serious physical injury or physical injury” (Penal Law § 120.15). According to the complainant’s testimony, while appellant’s companion made physically menacing gestures and stated, “Get out of my face, before I cut you, you Mexican,” appellant merely told complainant to “swim back to [his] country.” Appellant’s offensive comment, by itself, was insufficient to support the charge, which requires “physical menace” (see Matter of Akheem B., 308 AD2d 402, 403 [2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 506 [2004]). Even assuming appellant’s companion committed acts constituting third-degree menacing, the evidence does not support an inference that, in making this crude remark, appellant shared his companion’s intent to place the complainant in fear of harm, or intentionally aided his companion in doing so (see Penal Law § 20.00). Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Freedman, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Woods
54 Misc. 3d 453 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2016)
Matter of Mondy E.
121 A.D.3d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Martini
36 Misc. 3d 729 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 A.D.3d 523, 909 N.Y.S.2d 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jaccob-s-nyappdiv-2010.