In re: JAB, Ltd.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois·Decided March 24, 2026·No. 25-13020·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) inte ) Case No. 25bk13020 3 ) JAB, Ltd., ) Chapter 11 Debtor. ) . ) Judge Timothy A. Barnes

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ORDER AWARDING TO E. PHILIP GROBEN AND GENSBURG CALANDRIELLO & KANTER, P.C., ATTORNEYS FOR THE DEBTOR, FOR ALLOWANCE AND PAYMENT OF FINAL COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES TOTAL FEES REQUESTED: $29,595.00 TOTAL COSTS REQUESTED: — $1,989.17 TOTAL FEES REDUCED: $707.75 TOTAL COSTS REDUCED: $ 0.00 TOTAL FEES ALLOWED: $28,887.25 ‘TYOTALCOSTS ALLOWED: $ 1,989.17 TOTAL FEES AND COSTS ALLOWED: $30,876.42 ‘The attached time and expense entries have been underlined to reflect disallowance in whole or in part. The basis for each disallowance is reflected by numerical notations that appear on the left of each underlined entry. ‘The numerical notations correspond to the enumerated paragraphs below. (1) Unreasonable Time — TOTAL of disallowed amounts: $ 707.75 The Court denies the allowance in part of compensation for the indicated task(s) since the professional or paraprofessional expended an unreasonable amount of time on the task(s) in ight of the nature of the task(s), the experience and knowledge of the professional performing the task(s), and the amount of time previously expended by the professional or another on the task(s). I” re Pettibone, 74 B.R. 293, 306 (Bankr. N.D. Il. 1987) Schmetterer, J.) (“The Court will determine what is the reasonable amount of time an attorney should have to spend on a given project... An attorney should not be rewarded for inefficiency. Similarly, attorneys will not be fully compensated for spending an unreasonable number of hours on activities of little benefit to the estate.”); In re Wildman, 72 B.R. 700, 713 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1987) (Schmetterer, J.) (same). As to the time devoted to the preparation of the fee application itself, the Court denies the allowance of compensation that 1s disproportionate to the total hours in the main case. I” re Wildman, 72 B.R. 700, 711 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1987) (Schmetterer, J.) (“In the absence of unusual circumstances, the hours allowed by this Court for preparing and litigating the attorney fee application should not exceed three percent of the total hours in the main case.”’); In re Spanjer Bros., 203 B.R. 85, 93 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1996) Squires, J.) (compensation limited to 5%); see also In re Pettibone Corp., 74 B.R. 293, 304 (Bankr. N.D. ILL 1987) (Schmetterer, J.) (citing Coulter v. State of Tennessee, 805 F.2d 146, 151 (6th Cir. 1986) (Gn nonbankruptcy cases, compensation for preparation and litigation of fee petitions limited to 3-5% of the hours of the main case)). However, for applications for compensation that request total fees of $10,000.00 or less, this Court will allow

compensation for the time devoted to the preparation of the fee application itself in the following manner: For the first $5,000.00 of total compensation requested, this Court will limit time devoted to preparation of the fee application to 10% of total compensation requested and will allow 5% of additional total compensation requested for time devoted to preparation of the fee application.

Dated: March 24, 2026 Cc . — ‘Timothy A. Barnes, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court

° 2/3 Ss se i) oO | co) St) 9 co 3 mo wn a ° 1 Wo ° eB

wn a 2 slo = 2 hey 2 = ee 3 alo eB

=

□ ol8 S se oO tH 5 Ww Olea a □□

wn a 2° ole at 2 AT 3 3]

Lo} 2 2 | a es 1D 19) 9 3S Ma a q st) st oO Tt wn a no 5 18 a = a un c a Oo : 2 2B S Ss I 2 = S c 2 a = Ee on . uo jeje 13 oie 2 — eS 3 3 ale &£ - cc |2/2 |e ae & 3.8 D Qe 5\ = g =o 3/@ Z 2/2 a Ble = a n c eg □□ & Lie a SE: oases < £ = . #£n Ves = > £ a 3 Mmeceoectrns se 2/8 oo AZES Ze ee Seo dla elae oe 5 Fay Gio ce Sle py 8) 5/2 Bla Seas esas kt OF TO oF GG

ao no no fc c c 5 3 Ss £ Co 0 RB oO oO 2) 2 2 aqajaa a asjaq a 3 = <= 2 2 co © E/E EE & & > 2) 3 3 a ojo a a a =] SG ww) wi wi

a So oo □ D mb Ww Ww mo) 02 9 9 ad ad co | co) a a co co 8 8 § § =| a = = = = So 28 8) a) a Sui = ui ui 19 10 © AQAA N N 3 3S q q g g q 5 mS ANN N a gS g aaa A q a ad =)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: JAB, Ltd., (Ill. 2026).

In re: JAB, Ltd. (In re: JAB, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coulter v. State Of Tennessee
805 F.2d 146 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
In Re Wildman
72 B.R. 700 (N.D. Illinois, 1987)
In Re Pettibone Corp.
74 B.R. 293 (N.D. Illinois, 1987)
In Re Spanjer Bros., Inc.
203 B.R. 85 (N.D. Illinois, 1996)