in Re: Ja-Lynn Kuo JLKuo, PLLC Subho Mullick SM ER, PLC Salima Amin Thobani And SRG Consulting, LLC

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 27, 2022
• Docket: 05-22-00178-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Deny and Opinion Filed June 27, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00178-CV

IN RE JA-LYNN KUO; JLKUO, PLLC; SUBHO MULLICK; SM ER, PLC; SALIMA AMIN THOBANI; AND SRG CONSULTING, LLC, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-02273

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Osborne Before the Court are relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and real party in

interest’s response. In the petition, relators challenge the trial court’s order granting

real party’s motion to strike relators’ jury demand and the trial court’s order denying

relators’ motion for continuance.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that relators lack an adequate appellate remedy. In

re Copart, Inc., 619 S.W.3d 710, 713 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding) (citing In re

Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)). Based

on our review of the petition, response, and the record, we conclude that relators have failed to show an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for

writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

220178f.p05 /Leslie L. Osborne/ LESLIE L. OSBORNE JUSTICE

–2–