In Re J. Ray Riley v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re J. Ray Riley v. the State of Texas (In Re J. Ray Riley v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued July 11, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00494-CV ——————————— IN RE J. RAY RILEY, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, J. Ray Riley, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus asserting that
the trial court abused its discretion by failing to rule on his motion for entry of
judgment, which was filed February 11, 2022, and presented to the court at a
hearing on the motion on May 4, 2022.* Relator has informed this Court that the
trial court has entered final judgment.
* The underlying case is Riley v. Caridas, Cause Number 2016-04629, pending in the 281st District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Christine Weems presiding. This Court cannot decide a case that has become moot. See Heckman v.
Williamson Cnty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012); In re Salverson, No. 01-12-
00384-CV, 2013 WL 557264, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 14,
2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). “If a case is or becomes moot, the court must
vacate any order or judgment previously issued and dismiss the case for want of
jurisdiction.” Heckman, 369 S.W.3d at 162. Because the trial court granted the
requested relief, we must dismiss the mandamus proceeding as moot. See In re
Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding)
(“A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any
stage of the legal proceedings . . . .”); In re Jackson, No. 01-12-00020-CV, 2012
WL 405707, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 9, 2012, no pet.) (mem.
op.) (dismissing petition for writ of mandamus as moot because relator had
received requested relief).
Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. We
dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Countiss, and Rivas-Molloy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re J. Ray Riley v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-j-ray-riley-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.