in Re J. Michael Epstein

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 23, 2006
Docket14-05-01102-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re J. Michael Epstein (in Re J. Michael Epstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re J. Michael Epstein, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 23, 2006

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 23, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-05-01102-CV

IN RE J. MICHAEL EPSTEIN, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

On October 28, 2005, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  In the petition, relator asked this court to compel the Honorable Mike Wood, presiding judge of Probate Court No. 2, Harris County, to set aside his order, signed on August 19, 2005, granting Defendant, Howard Reiner=s Amended Motion to Transfer and for Consolidation in trial court cause no. 233,111-402, styled J. Michael Epstein v. Howard Reiner, Individually and as Substitute Trustee.


Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief.  Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.


PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 23, 2006.

Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Frost, and Seymore (Seymore, J., would grant relief).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re J. Michael Epstein, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-j-michael-epstein-texapp-2006.