in Re J. Kyle Bass
Opinion
Order entered July 20, 2021
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-21-00102-CV
IN RE J. KYLE BASS ET AL, Relator
Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-06253-C
ORDER Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia
Before the Court is real parties in interest’s June 8, 2021 amended
conditional motion to seal real parties’ supplemental mandamus record. Relators
advise us that some of the documents contained in the fifth supplemental
mandamus record have been designated as “Confidential—Subject to Protective
Order” in the proceedings below. Real parties state that, although they disagree
that the confidentiality designations are warranted, they have conditionally filed
this motion to comply with the trial court’s October 20, 2020 protective order.
However, they request that the Court deny the conditional motion. The trial court’s October 30, 2020 protective order does not appear to meet
the requirements of Rule 76a. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 76a (setting forth the
requirements for sealing court records). Accordingly, we will withhold our ruling
on the motion and will not post the fifth supplemental mandamus record to the
court’s website at this time. The parties have TWENTY DAYS from the date of
this order to provide a proper Rule 76a order from the trial court permitting the
filing of the fifth supplemental mandamus record under seal and to supplement the
mandamus record with a copy of that order. Failure to do so will result in the
denial of the motion, unless, within that timeframe, the parties submit briefing
establishing a valid legal basis on which we may maintain the documents under
seal without an order sealing the documents in the trial court.
/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re J. Kyle Bass (in Re J. Kyle Bass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.