in Re J. D.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00182-CV
In re J. D.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator’s filing, which we treat as a petition for writ of mandamus based on the
substance of his filing, is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); see also Surgitek, Bristol-Myers
Corp. v. Abel, 997 S.W.2d 598, 601 (Tex. 1999) (considering the substance of pleading rather
than form or caption to determine its nature).
__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith
Filed: April 14, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re J. D. (in Re J. D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.