in Re J. D.
This text of in Re J. D. (in Re J. D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00182-CV
In re J. D.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator’s filing, which we treat as a petition for writ of mandamus based on the
substance of his filing, is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); see also Surgitek, Bristol-Myers
Corp. v. Abel, 997 S.W.2d 598, 601 (Tex. 1999) (considering the substance of pleading rather
than form or caption to determine its nature).
__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith
Filed: April 14, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re J. D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-j-d-texapp-2022.