in Re: Ivory and Laverne Soileau
This text of in Re: Ivory and Laverne Soileau (in Re: Ivory and Laverne Soileau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed August 29, 2002.
|
|
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-02-00505-CV
IN RE IVORY SOILEAU AND LAVERNE SOILEAU, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
O P I N I O N
On May 29, 2002, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2002); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relators seek a writ of mandamus ordering the trial court to vacate the order signed April 23, 2002, and enter an order granting their motion to enforce the final judgment signed January 30, 1998, which was affirmed by this Court on June 28, 2001. Relators are not entitled to the relief sought because there is nothing in the record establishing that the trial court has ruled upon the motion to enforce. The only order in the record is the April 23, 2002, order which merely denies the motion for contempt.
Accordingly, we deny relators= petition for writ of mandamus.
/s/ J. Harvey Hudson
Justice
Petition Denied and Opinion filed August 29, 2002.
Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Fowler, and Edelman. (Fowler, J., would grant).
Do Not Publish ‑ Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Ivory and Laverne Soileau, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ivory-and-laverne-soileau-texapp-2002.