In Re Ishmael Jackson v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)·Decided February 27, 2026·No. 03-26-00018-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-26-00018-CV

In re Ishmael Jackson

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this original proceeding, relator Ishmael Jackson seeks relief from enforcement orders the trial court allegedly entered without authority. A party seeking mandamus relief has the burden of providing this Court with a sufficient record to establish his right to such relief. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992); see Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A) (requiring appendix to petition for writ of mandamus to include certified or sworn copy of order complained of and other documents showing matter complained of); 52.7(a)(2) (requiring relator to file with petition “a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence, or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter complained of”).

The appendix and record do not meet the requirements of Rules 52.3 and 52.7;

therefore, this Court lacks a record sufficient to assess the right to mandamus relief. We accordingly deny relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Maggie Ellis, Justice

Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Ellis Filed: February 27, 2026

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Ishmael Jackson v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

In Re Ishmael Jackson v. the State of Texas (In Re Ishmael Jackson v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)