In re Ishia Marie W. Lakeside Child & Family Services, Inc.

292 A.D.2d 535, 739 N.Y.S.2d 290, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2966
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 18, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 292 A.D.2d 535 (In re Ishia Marie W. Lakeside Child & Family Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ishia Marie W. Lakeside Child & Family Services, Inc., 292 A.D.2d 535, 739 N.Y.S.2d 290, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2966 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights, the mother appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated July 27, 1998, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, inter alia, terminated her parental rights and committed the custody of the child to the petitioner.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A suspended judgment may be revoked if the Family Court finds that a preponderance of the evidence adduced at a violation hearing establishes noncompliance with a condition of that judgment (see, Matter of William Ralph T., 286 AD2d 441; [536]*536Matter of Alka H., 278 AD2d 326; Matter of A. Children, 255 AD2d 510). The evidence presented at the violation hearing supports the Family Court’s determination that the mother failed to satisfy the conditions of her suspended judgment and that the termination of her parental rights was in the best interests of her child (see, Matter of Natanya Sharay G., 232 AD2d 487, 487-488; Matter of Maldrina R., 219 AD2d 723, 724).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Melissa M.
36 A.D.3d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Tyreek F.
20 A.D.3d 529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re Aaron S. Orange County Department of Social Services
15 A.D.3d 585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re Jordan Amir B.
15 A.D.3d 477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re Ulawrence J. Westchester County Department of Social Services
10 A.D.3d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re Amanda Crystal Juton A.
6 A.D.3d 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re Judith D.
307 A.D.2d 311 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re the Guardianship & Custody of Jonathan B.
193 Misc. 2d 52 (NYC Family Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
292 A.D.2d 535, 739 N.Y.S.2d 290, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ishia-marie-w-lakeside-child-family-services-inc-nyappdiv-2002.