In re Isaiah Keith B.

306 A.D.2d 343, 760 N.Y.S.2d 675
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 306 A.D.2d 343 (In re Isaiah Keith B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Isaiah Keith B., 306 A.D.2d 343, 760 N.Y.S.2d 675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

—In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals (1) from a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Queens County (Hunt, J.), dated March 25, 2002, which, after a hearing, determined that she derivatively neglected her child, Isaiah Keith B., and (2), as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of disposition of the same court dated May 22, 2002, as was entered upon the fact-finding order.

Ordered that the appeal from the fact-finding order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order of disposition; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the fact-finding order is vacated, and the proceeding is dismissed.

The Family Court’s finding that the appellant derivatively neglected her child, Isaiah Keith B., was based on prior findings of neglect with respect to her two other children. Two of the prior findings were remote in time and the conduct underlying the third finding, while occurring approximately three months before Isaiah Keith B. was born, was an isolated incident which did not warrant a finding of derivative neglect (see Matter of Department of Social Servs. [Doris M.] v Juana M., 232 AD2d 487 [1996]; Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Servs. [Amanda R.] v Alex R., 209 AD2d 702 [1994]). Consequently, the Family Court should have dismissed the proceeding. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Azayla K. L. (Aleisha L.)
2020 NY Slip Op 05902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
In re Andrew B.-L.
43 A.D.3d 1046 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 A.D.2d 343, 760 N.Y.S.2d 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-isaiah-keith-b-nyappdiv-2003.