In re Isaac M.

219 A.D.2d 805, 632 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10814
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The record supports Family Court’s finding that respondent committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [1]). Evidence that the victim experienced "a lot” of pain after respondent struck him with a skateboard and that stitches were required to close the cut beside the victim’s eye is sufficient to establish physical injury (see, People v Fallen, 194 AD2d 928, lv denied 82 NY2d 753; People v [806] Beaton, 152 AD2d 992, lv denied 74 NY2d 845; People v Ruttenbur, 112 AD2d 13).

We have examined respondent’s remaining contentions and conclude that they lack merit. (Appeal from Order of Niagara County Family Court, Crapsi, J. — Juvenile Delinquency.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Isaac M., 219 A.D.2d 805, 632 N.Y.S.2d 49, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

219 A.D.2d 805 (In re Isaac M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kelly
34 A.D.3d 1341 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Amin
294 A.D.2d 863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)