In re Isaac A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Isaac A.

201 A.D.2d 758, 608 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 877

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 758 (In re Isaac A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Isaac A., 201 A.D.2d 758, 608 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Otsego County (Estes, J.), entered April 17, 1992, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, to adjudicate Isaac A. a permanently neglected child, and terminated respondent’s parental rights.

Contrary to respondent’s contention, petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Isaac A. was permanently neglected. The record reveals that petitioner satisfied the statutory requirement that it make a diligent effort to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship, and that despite this effort respondent failed to take steps to provide for the future of her child although physically and financially able to do so (Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Otsego County (Estes, J.), entered April 17, 1992, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, to adjudicate Isaac A. a permanently neglected child, and terminated respondent’s parental rights.

Contrary to respondent’s contention, petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Isaac A. was permanently neglected. The record reveals that petitioner satisfied the statutory requirement that it make a diligent effort to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship, and that despite this effort respondent failed to take steps to provide for the future of her child although physically and financially able to do so (Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 758, 608 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-isaac-a-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack