in Re Irwin Pentland

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 17, 2022·No. 03-22-00394-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00394-CV

In re Irwin Pentland

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s

failure to hear or consider several motions he filed in an underlying suit affecting the parent-

child relationship. This Court subsequently received a supplemental record demonstrating the

trial court has set the motions for virtual or telephonic hearing on Friday, September 16, 2022

at 8:30 a.m. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig.

proceeding) (“A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any

stage of the legal proceedings ....”). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus

as moot.

__________________________________________ Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Kelly

Filed: August 17, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Irwin Pentland, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re Irwin Pentland (in Re Irwin Pentland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.
166 S.W.3d 732 (Texas Supreme Court, 2005)