in Re Irwin Pentland
This text of in Re Irwin Pentland (in Re Irwin Pentland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00394-CV
In re Irwin Pentland
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s
failure to hear or consider several motions he filed in an underlying suit affecting the parent-
child relationship. This Court subsequently received a supplemental record demonstrating the
trial court has set the motions for virtual or telephonic hearing on Friday, September 16, 2022
at 8:30 a.m. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig.
proceeding) (“A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any
stage of the legal proceedings ....”). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus
as moot.
__________________________________________ Thomas J. Baker, Justice
Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Kelly
Filed: August 17, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Irwin Pentland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-irwin-pentland-texapp-2022.