In re Irorere

87 F. App'x 901
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 20, 2004
DocketNo. 03-7653
StatusPublished

This text of 87 F. App'x 901 (In re Irorere) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Irorere, 87 F. App'x 901 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lucky Irorere petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to rule on his petition. Our review of the [902]*902district court’s docket sheet reveals that the magistrate judge issued a recommendation on November 17, 2003, and that, after seeking and receiving an extension of time, Irorere filed objections on January 14, 2004. Accordingly, because the case is progressing in a timely manner, we deny the mandamus petition. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 F. App'x 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-irorere-ca4-2004.