In re Irorere

87 F. App'x 901
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 20, 2004·No. No. 03-7653·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lucky Irorere petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to rule on his petition. Our review of the [902] district court’s docket sheet reveals that the magistrate judge issued a recommendation on November 17, 2003, and that, after seeking and receiving an extension of time, Irorere filed objections on January 14, 2004. Accordingly, because the case is progressing in a timely manner, we deny the mandamus petition. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Irorere, 87 F. App'x 901 (4th Cir. 2004).

87 F. App'x 901 (In re Irorere) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241