In Re Iron Oak, Inc. v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Iron Oak, Inc. v. the State of Texas (In Re Iron Oak, Inc. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued June 8, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00170-CV ——————————— IN RE IRON OAK, INC., Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Iron Oak, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus, asking that we
order the trial court to vacate its January 18, 2022 order prohibiting John T. Preston
and/or Michael Eugene Porter or any person acting on their behalf or in concert with
them from accepting or receiving any funds on deposit under or pursuant to the
Escrow Agreement between U.S. Bank, John T. Preston, Michael Eugene
Porter, and Continuum Energy Technologies.1 We dismiss this petition as moot.
1 The underlying case is Iron Oak, LLC v. Continuum Energy Technologies, LLC, cause number 2020-23705, pending in the 215th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Elaine Palmer presiding. On March 17, 2023, real parties in interest, John T. Preston and Michael
Eugene Porter, filed a motion to dismiss this original proceeding as moot, attaching
a copy of the trial court’s March 9, 2023 order which vacated the order of January
18, 2022 challenged in Iron Oak’s petition. Iron Oak filed no response opposing the
motion.
A case becomes moot if there is no longer a justiciable controversy between
the parties that may be resolved by mandamus relief. See Heckman v. Williamson
Cty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 166–67 (Tex. 2012). If a proceeding becomes moot, we must
dismiss the proceeding for lack of jurisdiction. See id.
Here, the order Iron Oak challenged in its petition for writ of mandamus was
vacated by the trial court in its March 9, 2023 order on summary judgment and
sanctions. Because the order challenged in Iron Oak’s petition has now been
vacated, this proceeding is moot.
We dismiss the petition as moot. Any pending motions are also dismissed as
moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Iron Oak, Inc. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-iron-oak-inc-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.