In re Irizarry
This text of 582 A.2d 296 (In re Irizarry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
RAMON A. IRIZARRY of NEWARK, who was admitted to the Bar of this State in 1980, having been Ordered to Show Cause on November 26, 1990 why this Court’s Order of temporary suspension should not be continued pending the disposition of ethics proceedings against him, and he, by his attorney, having consented to a continuation of his temporary suspension;
It is ORDERED that the suspension of RAMON A. IRIZARRY shall continue pending further Order of this Court; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent shall continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he shall continue to comply with Regulation 23 of the Administrative Guidelines Governing Suspended Attorneys; and it is further
ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics shall take such protective action pursuant to Rule 1:20-11(c) as it deems appropriate, including the transfer to the Clerk of the Superior Court [464]*464for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund of the attorney-account funds held in any financial institution by RAMON A. IRIZARRY, which funds were restrained from disbursement by this Court’s Order of July 17, 1990.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
582 A.2d 296, 121 N.J. 463, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-irizarry-nj-1990.