In re Irish

E.D. Pennsylvania

In re Irish

228 F. 573, 1915 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1011

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 28, 1915

DocketNo. 5611

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 228 F. 573 (In re Irish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Irish, 228 F. 573, 1915 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1011 (E.D. Pa. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This case has taken on a very practical phase and is disposed of with this in view. The real question involved is whether an insolvent, whose sole disclosed asset is real estate, may confess a judgment to his wife in an amount fully equal to the value of the real estate, and through the lien thus acquired ab[574]*574sorb all the assets, and by merely withholding execution escape bankruptcy proceedings against him. The petition of creditors as filed avers what was done to have been the act of bankruptcy set forth in clause (3) of section 3a. It has been authoritatively ruled by tire courts of this district that the things charged to have been done b3r the bankrupt do not constitute the act of bankruptcy set forth in this clause. This has been since settled for us as the law in Citizens’ Banking Co. v. Ravenna Bank, 234 U. S. 360, 34 Sup. Ct. 806, 58 L. Ed. 1352.

We have in consequence .the admission of counsel for petitioning creditors that the petition is not self-supporting. This situation is met by a request to amend, so- that the petition may aver the acts of bankruptcy defined in clauses (1) and (2) of the same section. It is argued for petitioners that the cause may proceed to an adjudication on these grounds, if unchallenged by an answer. Apparently counsel for the bankrupt feel embarrassed in meeting this argument, because the facts upon which the judgment of the court must proceed do not get upon the record until the amended petition has been filed. They, in consequence, adhere to' the position that the present petition discloses no basis for an adjudication, and the proceedings, because of this, should be dismissed. To meet this situation we allow an amendment of the petition to be filed averring any act of bankruptcy which the petitioners may feel justified in alleging, provided the amended petition is kept within the general scope of the facts set forth in the original petition. Such amended proceedings will be subject to any motion which the bankrupt may make, or the bankrupt may make answer thereto’, as if said amended petition had been originally filed.

If such amended petition be not filed in 10 days, an order dismissing the proceedings may be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This case has taken on a very practical phase and is disposed of with this in view. The real question involved is whether an insolvent, whose sole disclosed asset is real estate, may confess a judgment to his wife in an amount fully equal to the value of the real estate, and through the lien thus acquired ab[574]*574sorb all the assets, and by merely withholding execution escape bankruptcy proceedings against him. The petition of creditors as filed avers what was done to have been the act of bankruptcy set forth in clause (3) of section 3a. It has been authoritatively ruled by tire courts of this district that the things charged to have been done b3r the bankrupt do not constitute the act of bankruptcy set forth in this clause. This has been since settled for us as the law in Citizens’ Banking Co. v. Ravenna Bank, 234 U. S. 360, 34 Sup. Ct. 806, 58 L. Ed. 1352.

We have in consequence .the admission of counsel for petitioning creditors that the petition is not self-supporting. This situation is met by a request to amend, so- that the petition may aver the acts of bankruptcy defined in clauses (1) and (2) of the same section. It is argued for petitioners that the cause may proceed to an adjudication on these grounds, if unchallenged by an answer. Apparently counsel for the bankrupt feel embarrassed in meeting this argument, because the facts upon which the judgment of the court must proceed do not get upon the record until the amended petition has been filed. They, in consequence, adhere to' the position that the present petition discloses no basis for an adjudication, and the proceedings, because of this, should be dismissed. To meet this situation we allow an amendment of the petition to be filed averring any act of bankruptcy which the petitioners may feel justified in alleging, provided the amended petition is kept within the general scope of the facts set forth in the original petition. Such amended proceedings will be subject to any motion which the bankrupt may make, or the bankrupt may make answer thereto’, as if said amended petition had been originally filed.

If such amended petition be not filed in 10 days, an order dismissing the proceedings may be entered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 F. 573, 1915 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-irish-paed-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack