in Re Intex Recreation Corp.
This text of in Re Intex Recreation Corp. (in Re Intex Recreation Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00518-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE INTEX RECREATION CORP.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
On October 28, 2022, relator Intex Recreation Corp. filed a petition for writ of
mandamus contending through five issues that the trial court abused its discretion by
granting a motion for summary judgment which implicates issues regarding parental
immunity, proportional responsibility, the standard of care, the “reasonably foreseeable
risk” of personal injury, and contributory negligence.
The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Jaime Flores and Veronica
Flores, individually and on behalf of the estate of A.F. and as next friend of J.C., minor
child, and William Kobus, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the
expiration of ten (10) days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4,
52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 31st day of October, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Intex Recreation Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-intex-recreation-corp-texapp-2022.