in Re Intex Recreation Corp.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00518-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE INTEX RECREATION CORP.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
On October 28, 2022, relator Intex Recreation Corp. filed a petition for writ of mandamus contending through five issues that the trial court abused its discretion by granting a motion for summary judgment which implicates issues regarding parental immunity, proportional responsibility, the standard of care, the “reasonably foreseeable risk” of personal injury, and contributory negligence.
The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Jaime Flores and Veronica Flores, individually and on behalf of the estate of A.F. and as next friend of J.C., minor child, and William Kobus, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the
relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten (10) days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 31st day of October, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Intex Recreation Corp. (in Re Intex Recreation Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.