In Re Intership Services, Inc. v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Intership Services, Inc. v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 11, 2023·No. 14-23-00230-CV·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 11, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00230-CV

IN RE INTERSHIP SERVICES, INC., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 164th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015-39297

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 10, 2023, relator Intership Services, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator challenges the April 6, 2021 written ruling striking relator’s third amended petition and March 29, 2023 oral ruling striking relator’s fourth amended petition by the Honorable C. Elliott Thornton, presiding judge of the 164th District Court of Harris County, and asks this court to remand for reconsideration of those rulings.

Relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny relator’s motion for temporary relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Wilson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 11, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00230-CV

IN RE INTERSHIP SERVICES, INC., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 164th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015-39297

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 10, 2023, relator Intership Services, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator challenges the April 6, 2021 written ruling striking relator’s third amended petition and March 29, 2023 oral ruling striking relator’s fourth amended petition by the Honorable C. Elliott Thornton, presiding judge of the 164th District Court of Harris County, and asks this court to remand for reconsideration of those rulings.

Relator has not established that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny relator’s motion for temporary relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Wilson.

In Re Intership Services, Inc. v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

In Re Intership Services, Inc. v. the State of Texas (In Re Intership Services, Inc. v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.