In Re Interrogatories of the Senate

67 P.2d 1038, 100 Colo. 342, 1937 Colo. LEXIS 424
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided April 19, 1937·No. No. 14,149.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Interrogatory 1. Hoes House Bill No. 379 and particularly section 20 thereof conflict with section 2 (a) of Amendment No. 4 to the Constitution, “The Old Age Pension Amendment? ’’

The answer is No.

In view of our answer to interrogatory No. 1, answer to the second interrogatory is unnecessary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Interrogatories of the Senate, 67 P.2d 1038, 100 Colo. 342, 1937 Colo. LEXIS 424 (Colo. 1937).

67 P.2d 1038 (In Re Interrogatories of the Senate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conklin v. Armstrong
105 P.2d 854 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1940)