In Re Interrogatories of the Senate
67 P.2d 1038, 100 Colo. 342, 1937 Colo. LEXIS 424
This text of 67 P.2d 1038 (In Re Interrogatories of the Senate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In Re Interrogatories of the Senate, 67 P.2d 1038, 100 Colo. 342, 1937 Colo. LEXIS 424 (Colo. 1937).
Opinion
Interrogatory 1. Hoes House Bill No. 379 and particularly section 20 thereof conflict with section 2 (a) of Amendment No. 4 to the Constitution, “The Old Age Pension Amendment? ’’
The answer is No.
In view of our answer to interrogatory No. 1, answer to the second interrogatory is unnecessary.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Conklin v. Armstrong
105 P.2d 854 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1940)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
67 P.2d 1038, 100 Colo. 342, 1937 Colo. LEXIS 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-interrogatories-of-the-senate-colo-1937.