in Re: International Hospital Corporation Holding N v.
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed August 23, 2016.
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00615-CV
IN RE INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION HOLDING N.V., Relator
Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-06257
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Lang-Miers, Fillmore, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Schenck Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which it seeks relief from
the trial court’s July 10, 2015 abatement order and the trial court’s March 29, 2016 denial of relator’s motion to lift abatement. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them here.
To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
/s/ David Schenck
DAVID SCHENCK
JUSTICE
160615F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: International Hospital Corporation Holding N v. (in Re: International Hospital Corporation Holding N v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.