In Re Interested Party 1
This text of 530 F. Supp. 2d 198 (In Re Interested Party 1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re INTERESTED PARTY 1 and
In re Interested Party 2,
In the Matter of United States
v.
Qantas Airways Limited.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.
Kerri L. Ruttenberg, Dewey & Leboeuf, LLP, Washington, DC, for Interested Party 1.
Elizabeth G. Taylor, Zuckerman Spaeder, LLP, Washington, DC, Daniel T. Hartnett, Royal B. Martin, Martin Brown & Sullivan, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Interested Party 2.
Brent C. Snyder, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for United States.
ORDER
JOHN D. BATES District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion issued on January 9, 2008, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Order entered on December 21, 2007 granting the applicants' motion to seal is VACATED; and it is further
ORDERED that this case shall be UNSEALED in its entirety.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
530 F. Supp. 2d 198, 2008 WL 151233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-interested-party-1-dcd-2008.