In re Interest of Quincy J.
This text of In re Interest of Quincy J. (In re Interest of Quincy J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Nebraska Advance Sheets 576 287 NEBRASKA REPORTS
consequences. Under § 43-247.02(2), on and after July 1, 2013, a juvenile court can commit a juvenile to OJS for place ment at a YRTC only as part of an order of ISP. But because Marcella had already been committed to OJS for placement at a level less restrictive than a YRTC and only later transferred to a YRTC after July 1, subsection (2) does not apply. We conclude that § 43-247.02(3) controls and that the juvenile court acted within its authority when it transferred Marcella to the YRTC without making the placement as part of an order of ISP. Affirmed.
In re I nterest of Quincy J., a child under 18 years of age. State of Nebraska, Department of Health and Human Services, appellant, v. Quincy J., appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___
Filed February 28, 2014. No. S-13-664.
Appeal from the Separate Juvenile Court of Lancaster County: R eggie L. Ryder, Judge. Affirmed. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, and C.J. Roberts, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Toni Leija-Wilson for appellee. S.A. Mora James, guardian ad litem. Heavican, C.J., Wright, Connolly, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman, and Cassel, JJ. Cassel, J. This case raises the same issue as that presented in In re Interest of Marcella G.,1 decided today. The juvenile court committed Quincy J. to the custody of the Office of Juvenile Services for treatment at a level less restrictive than a youth
1 In re Interest of Marcella G., ante p. 566, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2014). Nebraska Advance Sheets IN RE INTEREST OF QUINCY J. 577 Cite as 287 Neb. 576
rehabilitation and treatment center prior to July 1, 2013, and, after July 1, sustained a motion to transfer him to a youth rehabilitation and treatment center. For the same reasons set forth in In re Interest of Marcella G., we affirm the decision of the juvenile court. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re Interest of Quincy J., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-interest-of-quincy-j-neb-2014.