In Re Interest of Jlw

Missouri Court of Appeals

In Re Interest of Jlw

359 S.W.3d 499

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 17, 2012

DocketWD 73790

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 359 S.W.3d 499 (In Re Interest of Jlw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Interest of Jlw, 359 S.W.3d 499 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

359 S.W.3d 499 (2012)

In the Interest of J.L.W., Plaintiff,
Juvenile Officer, Respondent.
Missouri Children's Division, Respondent
v.
D.R. (Father), Appellant.

No. WD 73790.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, Division One.

January 17, 2012. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 28, 2012.

Christopher Rohrer, Osage Beach, MO, for Appellant.

Ruth Schulte, Lake Ozark, MO, Counsel and Guardian for Plaintiff.

Robert Seek, Eldon, MO, for Respondent, Juvenile Officer.

Gary Gardner, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent, MO Children's Div.

Before ALOK AHUJA, P.J., THOMAS H. NEWTON, and JAMES EDWARD WELSH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

D.R. appeals the circuit court's judgment terminating his parental rights to his biological child, J.L.W. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

359 S.W.3d 499 (2012)

In the Interest of J.L.W., Plaintiff,
Juvenile Officer, Respondent.
Missouri Children's Division, Respondent
v.
D.R. (Father), Appellant.

No. WD 73790.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, Division One.

January 17, 2012. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 28, 2012.

Christopher Rohrer, Osage Beach, MO, for Appellant.

Ruth Schulte, Lake Ozark, MO, Counsel and Guardian for Plaintiff.

Robert Seek, Eldon, MO, for Respondent, Juvenile Officer.

Gary Gardner, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent, MO Children's Div.

Before ALOK AHUJA, P.J., THOMAS H. NEWTON, and JAMES EDWARD WELSH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

D.R. appeals the circuit court's judgment terminating his parental rights to his biological child, J.L.W. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

359 S.W.3d 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-interest-of-jlw-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

In the Interest of J.L.W., Plaintiff, Juvenile Officer, Respondent. Missouri Children's Division, Respondent v. D.R. (Father), Appellant.

ORDER

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

In the Interest of J.L.W., Plaintiff,
Juvenile Officer, Respondent.
Missouri Children's Division, Respondent
v.
D.R. (Father), Appellant.