In re Interest of D.R.C.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In re Interest of D.R.C.

566 S.W.3d 265

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 22, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106110

StatusPublished

This text of 566 S.W.3d 265 (In re Interest of D.R.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Interest of D.R.C., 566 S.W.3d 265 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

R.C. appeals the circuit court's judgment appointing J.C. as D.R.C.'s guardian after both of D.R.C.'s parents died. Finding that the circuit court's judgment was not unsupported by substantial evidence, against the weight of the evidence, or an erroneous declaration or application of the law, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

R.C. appeals the circuit court's judgment appointing J.C. as D.R.C.'s guardian after both of D.R.C.'s parents died. Finding that the circuit court's judgment was not unsupported by substantial evidence, against the weight of the evidence, or an erroneous declaration or application of the law, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

566 S.W.3d 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-interest-of-drc-moctapp-2019.