In re Insogna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Insogna

26 A.D.2d 774, 273 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4798

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 774 (In re Insogna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Insogna, 26 A.D.2d 774, 273 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in this State at a term of this court on October 1, 1953. A certified copy of a judgment of conviction of the County Court of Montgomery County, filed pursuant to section 485-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure, discloses that he was convicted of the crimes of bribery of a witness and bribing a witness in violation of sections 379 and 2440 of the Penal Law. These crimes being felonies, respondent is no longer competent to practice law. (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd. 4; Matter of Ginsberg, 1 N Y 2d 144.) Respondent’s name stricken from roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law of the State of New York. Present — Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in this State at a term of this court on October 1, 1953. A certified copy of a judgment of conviction of the County Court of Montgomery County, filed pursuant to section 485-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure, discloses that he was convicted of the crimes of bribery of a witness and bribing a witness in violation of sections 379 and 2440 of the Penal Law. These crimes being felonies, respondent is no longer competent to practice law. (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd. 4; Matter of Ginsberg, 1 N Y 2d 144.) Respondent’s name stricken from roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law of the State of New York. Present — Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 774, 273 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-insogna-nyappdiv-1966.