In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge Stancil

451 So. 2d 480, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2996
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 1984
DocketNo. 63885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 451 So. 2d 480 (In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge Stancil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge Stancil, 451 So. 2d 480, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2996 (Fla. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Judicial Qualifications Commission initiated this proceeding accusing County Judge Hale R. Stancil of a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The Commission filed with this Court its finding of a violation and a recommendation of a public reprimand. We issued an order to Judge Stan-cil to show cause why the recommendation should not be followed. He filed his response to the order to show cause. Now the Commission has filed a reply to Judge Stancil’s response, withdrawing its previous recommendation of a public reprimand.

The Commission having withdrawn its recommendation of a public reprimand, we find, based on the lack of clear and convincing evidence, that Judge Stancil is not guilty of the charged violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

This proceeding on judicial conduct is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ALDERMAN, C.J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armstrong v. Munford, Inc.
451 So. 2d 480 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
451 So. 2d 480, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-inquiry-concerning-a-judge-stancil-fla-1984.