in Re Innovative Solutions, LLC and James S Goddard, Jr.
This text of in Re Innovative Solutions, LLC and James S Goddard, Jr. (in Re Innovative Solutions, LLC and James S Goddard, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 15, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00597-CV ——————————— IN RE INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS, LLC AND JAMES S. GODDARD JR., Relators
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators Innovative Solutions, LLC and James S. Goddard Jr. challenge the
trial court’s oral order sending the parties to mediation.1 Relators have also filed a
motion to stay the trial court’s order pending disposition of this proceeding.
1 The underlying case is Harris Kempner Jr. and Harris Kempner III v. Innovative Vision Solutions, LLC and James S. Goddard, Jr., cause number 16-CV-0912, pending in the 212th District Court of Galveston County, Texas, the Honorable Patricia Grady presiding. Relators have not demonstrated that the trial court abused its discretion in
sending the parties to mediation. See In re Ford Motor Co., 988 S.W.2d 714, 718
(Tex. 1998) (mandamus will only issue if relator demonstrates both abuse of
discretion by trial court and no adequate remedy by appeal). Accordingly, we deny
the petition. All pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Innovative Solutions, LLC and James S Goddard, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-innovative-solutions-llc-and-james-s-goddard-jr-texapp-2019.