In re Ingram

47 A.3d 556, 2012 WL 2580808
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 5, 2012
DocketNo. 12-BG-690
StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.3d 556 (In re Ingram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ingram, 47 A.3d 556, 2012 WL 2580808 (D.C. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the affidavit of Jesse H. Ingram, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is this 5th day of July, 2012,

ORDERED that the respondent, Jesse H. Ingram, is hereby disbarred by consent, effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment shall run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files an affidavit in full compliance with D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g).

The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed [557]*557or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent.

The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§ 14 and 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure, to comply therewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A.3d 556, 2012 WL 2580808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ingram-dc-2012.