In Re Ingalls

139 U.S. 548, 11 S. Ct. 652, 35 L. Ed. 266, 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2406
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 13, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 U.S. 548 (In Re Ingalls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Ingalls, 139 U.S. 548, 11 S. Ct. 652, 35 L. Ed. 266, 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2406 (1891).

Opinion

Per Curíam.

This is an application for a writ of error made to the court in session, under the apprehension on the part of counsel that it was directed to be so presented. We have, therefore, considered it, with the result that the writ must be denied. Dale Tile Mfg. Co. v. Hyatt, 125 U. S. 46; Walter A. Wood Co. v. Skinner, ante, 293.

We wish it to be distinctly .understood that in future no •such application will be entertained, except when a Justice of this Court, upon consideration of the record, has deemed it proper under special circumstances to endorse thereon a request that counsel be permitted to proceed in that way.

Writ refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lefkowitz v. Foster Hose Supporter Co.
161 F. 367 (S.D. New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 U.S. 548, 11 S. Ct. 652, 35 L. Ed. 266, 1891 U.S. LEXIS 2406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ingalls-scotus-1891.