In re Ingalls Bros.

Second Circuit

In re Ingalls Bros.

137 F. 517, 70 C.C.A. 101, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4574

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 1, 1905·No. No. 121·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The referee rejected the claims, but the District Judge reversed his ruling, evidently in order to conform the practice in the Northern District to that followed in the Southern District. In re Seif (unreported). The opinion of the referee sets forth the facts, and contains a very full discussion of the questions of law involved, and we concur in his interpretation of the statute and in his conclusions. His opinion is not reported, but it may be printed as a supplement to this memorandum.

The order of the District Court is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The referee rejected the claims, but the District Judge reversed his ruling, evidently in order to conform the practice in the Northern District to that followed in the Southern District. In re Seif (unreported). The opinion of the referee sets forth the facts, and contains a very full discussion of the questions of law involved, and we concur in his interpretation of the statute and in his conclusions. His opinion is not reported, but it may be printed as a supplement to this memorandum.

The order of the District Court is reversed.

In re Ingalls Bros., 137 F. 517, 70 C.C.A. 101, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4574 (2d Cir. 1905).

Pincite

137 F. 517 (In re Ingalls Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related