In re Ingalls Bros.

137 F. 517, 70 C.C.A. 101, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4574
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 1, 1905
DocketNo. 121
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 137 F. 517 (In re Ingalls Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ingalls Bros., 137 F. 517, 70 C.C.A. 101, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4574 (2d Cir. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The referee rejected the claims, but the District Judge reversed his ruling, evidently in order to conform the practice in the Northern District to that followed in the Southern District. In re Seif (unreported). The opinion of the referee sets forth the facts, and contains a very full discussion of the questions of law involved, and we concur in his interpretation of the statute and in his conclusions. His opinion is not reported, but it may be printed as a supplement to this memorandum.

The order of the District Court is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilkinson v. Walker
292 F. 395 (N.D. Texas, 1923)
In re Edelen
248 F. 580 (W.D. Kentucky, 1918)
In re Meyer
181 F. 904 (D. Oregon, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 F. 517, 70 C.C.A. 101, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ingalls-bros-ca2-1905.