In Re Inforex, Inc.

10 B.R. 497, 1 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 159, 1979 Bankr. LEXIS 794, 5 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 961
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedNovember 2, 1979
Docket14-14695
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 B.R. 497 (In Re Inforex, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Inforex, Inc., 10 B.R. 497, 1 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 159, 1979 Bankr. LEXIS 794, 5 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 961 (Mass. 1979).

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS W. LAWLESS, Bankruptcy Judge.

Dated at Boston, Massachusetts, in said District, this 2nd day of November, 1979.

This matter having come on before this Court on the Debtor’s Application To Use Cash Collateral, notice of said application having been given to the secured lenders and some but not all third party lessors, and counsel for the Debtor and certain secured lenders and third party lessors having been heard and based upon testimony taken and other evidence introduced and arguments presented at said hearing, I make the following Findings of Fact:

1. Prior to the commencement of the reorganization proceeding, the Debtor was financed through various lending, financing, agency and other agreements with the following:

The First National Bank of Chicago (“Chicago Bank”)
Industrial National Bank of Rhode Island (“Rhode Island Bank”)
First National Bank of Boston (“Boston Bank”)
*498 New England Merchants Funding Corporation (“Merchants Funding” formerly known as New England Merchants Leasing Company E (“Merchants Leasing”)) Manufacturers Hanover Leasing Company (“Manufacturers Leasing”) Citytrust (“Connecticut Bank”)
Wells Fargo Leasing Company (“Wells Fargo”)
Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”)
Lease Financing Corporation (“LFC”)
Knox Leasing Corporation (“Knox”)
United States Portfolio Leasing, Inc. (“U. S.Leasing”)
(collectively referred to hereinafter as the “Financing Group”).

2. Prior to the commencement of the reorganization proceedings herein, the Debtor maintain various depository, special purpose and operating accounts with the Banks set forth on Schedule A [omitted from publication] (the “Depository Accounts”).

3. Pursuant to the terms of the various agreements, lessees of equipment remit payment to certain Depository Accounts.

4. In order to remain a viable corporation, the Debtor must pay its employees and its commission salesmen for the work performed and expenses incurred. In addition, it must purchase for cash the necessary parts and supplies needed to produce the products ordered by its customers and lessees, and provide spare parts for its field maintenance employees and lessees. It must also provide heat, telephone, electricity and other utility services to its factory and its various offices throughout the country.

5. In order to make the purchases, commitments and payments required above, the Debtor must employ the funds presently collected in the Depository Accounts and the funds which will come into the Depository Accounts on a daily basis. The estimated amounts needed for each category of expense are set forth on page 17 of Schedule B hereto [omitted from publication] (which is the Debtor’s “Business Plan” (new title) marked as Exhibit A at the hearing) under the caption “Disbursements”.

6. The use of the funds will enable the debtor to ship for immediate payment equipment already produced, meet certain production orders and maintain leased equipment in the field. If the leased field equipment is not maintained, the rents owed by lessees will not be forthcoming.

7. The Debtor owns and controls the stock of:

Inforex, GmbH (Germany)
Inforex A.G. (Switzerland)
Inforex France S.A.R.L. (France)
Inforex B.V. (Netherlands)
Inforex Italiai, Spa. (Italy)
Inforex, Ltd. (United Kingdom)
Inforex GesmbH (Austria)

(the “Foreign Subsidiaries”) which stock has not been pledged by the Debtor and has considerable value in excess of $5,600,000.

8. In the event the operating funds necessary to continue the Debtor’s business are not made available, the Debtor will have to be liquidated under Chapter 7 and this will result in a termination of the Debtor’s maintenance services to the users of its equipment and a sharp drop in the going concern value of the income streams and the inventory as shown on pages 14 and 17 of the Debtor’s Business Plan Exhibit B (marked Exhibit A at the hearing). For example, the Debtor’s Chief Financial Officer testified that the experience with customers who failed to pay on purchase or lease contracts or for maintenance after complaints as to maintenance indicated that the gross receipts would drop by 75% within 45 days after the Debtor ceased operations. That witness also testified that within the last month the Debtor had attempted to sell a portion of its inventory with a book value of $300,000 and had received as the highest bid an offer of $10,000. The inventory offered for sale was from that type of inventory which is newest and which represents 60% of all the Debtor’s inventory.

9. There is a question as to whether the revenues from the Debtor’s maintenance operation should be subject to a security interest under the power granted this Court *499 by Section 506(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. .There was uncontradicted testimony at the hearing that the cost of providing maintenance services exceeded the revenue received from such services not including any portion of general and administration expenses properly allocable to the maintenance services.

10. Page 17 of the Debtor’s Business Plan (included as Exhibit A at the hearing), reflects the projected cash flow of the Debtor in the form of gross receipts and gross disbursements through January 4, 1980. The estimates contained in said Business Plan were prepared completely in good faith and represented a reasonable forecast.

11. During this hearing no allegations were made or introduced of any fraud, dishonesty, incompetence, misconduct, mismanagement or any other irregularity in the management of the affairs of the Debt- or by current management who, although experienced, were appointed in a reorganization by the Debtor’s management only within the last two weeks. I would have expected none since the matter was not in issue.

I make the following Rulings of Law:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cashman Investment Corp. v. Robinson (In Re Bradley)
38 B.R. 425 (C.D. California, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 B.R. 497, 1 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 159, 1979 Bankr. LEXIS 794, 5 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-inforex-inc-mab-1979.