In Re Import Toy Sales, Inc.

41 B.R. 784, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5171, 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 255
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
DecidedAugust 21, 1984
Docket17-15987
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 41 B.R. 784 (In Re Import Toy Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Import Toy Sales, Inc., 41 B.R. 784, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5171, 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 255 (Fla. 1984).

Opinion

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THOMAS C. BRITTON, Bankruptcy Judge.

This voluntary chapter 7 case was filed on July 12, 1984. In accordance with 11 U.S.C. § 341, a meeting of creditors was scheduled for August 20. The debtor's attendance and availability for examination under oath at that hearing is mandatory. § 343. The debtor corporation did not appear through any authorized agent. Instead, a motion was filed by counsel on the hearing date stating that the corporation’s “principal and operating officer”, F.S. Capel, had a heart attack and is hospitalized for an as yet undetermined period.

The effect of the bankruptcy petition was to grant this corporation a statutory injunction against all creditor activity. § 362(a). In return, the debtor is obligated to make itself available to both the trustee and creditors for examination in order that the estate may be protected and administered without delay. If, as is represented by the debtor’s motion, this corporation is completely immobilized and unable to discharge its duty for an undetermined time, the administration of this case becomes impossible and the trustee cannot reasonably nor adequately protect the interests of creditors.

Accordingly, on this court’s own motion, this case is dismissed with prejudice to the filing of any other voluntary bankruptcy proceeding by this debtor until this corporation is in a position to meet its statutory obligations under the statute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chadrus Lequardra Brown
N.D. Georgia, 2020
In Re Michael
285 B.R. 553 (S.D. Georgia, 2002)
Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Fekos (In Re Fekos)
148 B.R. 10 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1992)
In Re Moses
792 F. Supp. 529 (E.D. Michigan, 1992)
In Re Steinmetz Group Ltd.
85 B.R. 633 (S.D. Florida, 1988)
In Re Chandler
66 B.R. 334 (N.D. Georgia, 1986)
In Re Connelly
59 B.R. 421 (N.D. Illinois, 1986)
In Re Blanchette
54 B.R. 890 (D. Rhode Island, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 B.R. 784, 1984 Bankr. LEXIS 5171, 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-import-toy-sales-inc-flsb-1984.