In re Iesha J.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Iesha J.

183 A.D.2d 573

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 183 A.D.2d 573 (In re Iesha J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Iesha J., 183 A.D.2d 573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Family Court, New York County (Judith B. Sheindlin, J.), entered on or about June 27, 1991, dismissing this educational neglect petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The proceeding was properly dismissed for lack of proof that respondent failed to exercise a minimum degree of care in providing her daughter with an education, and that the child’s physical, mental or emotional condition was impaired as a result (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [A]; Matter of Shelley Renea K., 79 AD2d 1073). Respondent’s uncontroverted testimony at the fact-finding hearing shows that she attempted to find a safe school for her daughter to attend, and that she provided her with a home tutor while absent from school. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Wallach, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Family Court, New York County (Judith B. Sheindlin, J.), entered on or about June 27, 1991, dismissing this educational neglect petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The proceeding was properly dismissed for lack of proof that respondent failed to exercise a minimum degree of care in providing her daughter with an education, and that the child’s physical, mental or emotional condition was impaired as a result (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [A]; Matter of Shelley Renea K., 79 AD2d 1073). Respondent’s uncontroverted testimony at the fact-finding hearing shows that she attempted to find a safe school for her daughter to attend, and that she provided her with a home tutor while absent from school. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Wallach, Kupferman and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 A.D.2d 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-iesha-j-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack