In re Ibn Khalil A-S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ibn Khalil A-S.

102 A.D.3d 520, 957 N.Y.S.2d 859

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 102 A.D.3d 520 (In re Ibn Khalil A-S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ibn Khalil A-S., 102 A.D.3d 520, 957 N.Y.S.2d 859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen G. Alpert, J.), entered on or about September 28, 2011, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. The officer’s testimony supports the conclusion that appellant intentionally participated in the theft of a bicycle (see Penal Law § 20.00). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, DeGrasse, Richter and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen G. Alpert, J.), entered on or about September 28, 2011, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. The officer’s testimony supports the conclusion that appellant intentionally participated in the theft of a bicycle (see Penal Law § 20.00). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, DeGrasse, Richter and Clark, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A.D.3d 520, 957 N.Y.S.2d 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ibn-khalil-a-s-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack