in Re Hyundam Industrial Company, Ltd.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-21-00026-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE HYUNDAM INDUSTRIAL COMPANY, LTD.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Silva Order Per Curiam
Relator Hyundam Industrial Company, Ltd. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on January 21, 2021. Through this original proceeding, relator seeks to compel the trial court to vacate its January 13, 2021 order compelling discovery and strike certain specified interrogatories and requests for production. Relator has also filed a motion to stay through which it seeks to stay the production of the discovery at issue.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion to stay, is of the opinion that it should be granted as stated herein. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). The motion to stay is GRANTED and the trial court’s January 13, 2021 order is STAYED pending
further order of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”).
The Court requests that the real party in interest, Paul Swacina, as Successor Guardian of the Person and Estate of Johari Kibibi Powell, an incapacitated person, Paul Swacina as next friend of D.A.P., D.A.C., and D.A.C., minor children, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 21st day of January, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Hyundam Industrial Company, Ltd. (in Re Hyundam Industrial Company, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.