In re Hylan

242 A.D. 260, 275 N.Y.S. 522, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6041
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 29, 1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J.,

dissents and votes to reverse the orders upon the ground that the court should have directed the objectors to furnish the proponents of the nominating petition with a bill of particulars to permit preparation for the trial; and upon the further ground that illegal evidence was received and considered by the court. The witness Finn, election commissioner of Clinton county, was not the legal custodian of the registry lists between the completion thereof and election day. (Election Law, § 181.)

Twenty-four thousand electors of New York State have attempted to place a ticket in nomination. Their expressed desires should not be thwarted upon technical grounds.

Orders affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Hylan, 242 A.D. 260, 275 N.Y.S. 522, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6041 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

242 A.D. 260 (In re Hylan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunt v. Superior Court Ex Rel. Navajo County
170 P.2d 293 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1946)